Skip to content

清涟居

何清涟个人主页

  • 学术思考
  • 中国观察
  • 经济分析
  • 世界与中国
  • 国土生态
  • 历史与文化
  • 读书与随笔
  • 采访与演讲
  • 英文文章
  • 日文文章
  • 程晓农文集
  • Toggle search form
  • 媒体舆论、政府意见与利润:资本最听谁的话? ——2022年外商投资中国增长分析 世界与中国
  • 日本SAPIO杂志的采访(2005年3月3日) 采访与演讲
  • 中国外交部两副面孔交替出场的奥秘 世界与中国
  • 大重置与中国对美的政治渗透 世界与中国
  • 日记所展现的人格与国品 读书与随笔
  • 捐款排行榜遗忘了哪个巨富群体?――兼谈政治控制下的“民意”表达 中国观察
  • 程晓农:中共继承斯大林式冷战? 世界与中国
  • 美中关系的晴天版与阴天版再次交战 世界与中国

Open Alliance of Power and Money Meets in Beijing

Posted on November 3, 2012January 31, 2013 By 何清涟 No Comments on Open Alliance of Power and Money Meets in Beijing

The Communist Party’s 18th Congress helps turn power into wealth

By He Qinglian Created: November 13, 2012 Last Updated: November 13, 2012

http://www.theepochtimes.com/n2/opinion/open-alliance-of-power-and-money-meets-in-beijing-314232.html

People sharing a scooter ride past oil rigs in Cangzhou on Feb. 25, 2009, in northern China’s Hebei Province. Politically connected families control China’s major industries, with the oil industry dominated by the family of security czar Zhou Yongkang. (Frederic J. Bwown/AFP/Getty Images)

The United States presidential and general elections and the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) 18th Party Congress, which commences its once-in-a-decade process of installing new leadership, were held almost simultaneously this year.

The Chinese regime’s propaganda has been saying that the U.S. capitalist system is money-driven politics that favors the big bourgeoisie and the rich, whereas China is a socialist country whose politics favor the overwhelming majority of the people. The composition of the CCP’s 18th Congress tells a different story, one involving an alliance of power and money.

Political Elites and the Rich

The state-run Xinhua News Agency recently published an article by China Economic Weekly titled “Red Entrepreneurs.” The article reported that, according to incomplete statistics, 145 out of the 2,270 Party delegates are CEOs of state-owned enterprises, banks, and financial institutions, and of private enterprises from provinces and municipalities.

Bloomberg News published an article in February, titled, “China’s Billionaire People’s Congress Makes Capitol Hill Look Like Pauper,” saying, “The net worth of the 70 richest delegates in China’s National People’s Congress, which opens its annual session on March 5, rose to 565.8 billion yuan (US$89.8 billion) in 2011, a gain of US$11.5 billion from 2010, according to figures from the “Hurun Report,” which tracks the country’s wealthy. That compares to the US$7.5 billion net worth of all 660 top officials in the three branches of the U.S. government.”

The 18th Party Congress is hosting political and military elites, along with rich businessmen.

Marketization of Power

Through messages circulating on Weibo, China’s twitter-like platform, the Chinese people came to realize a cruel reality about the elections in the two countries: the United States is more like the socialism that China claims to be, while China features crony capitalism.

In the United States, rich peoples’ wealth is mainly attributed to personal capabilities. Bill Gates is a successful player in the computer industry. Internationally renowned investor George Soros is a Hungarian immigrant. Michael Bloomberg, the New York City mayor who accepts a symbolic salary of one dollar per year, had already built a media empire before he assumed the office of mayor. Their stories demonstrate the advantages of the U.S. social system.

In China, however, wealth is closely tied to power behind the scenes, and political power has been a magic wand that creates wealthy tycoons.

Political power has been a magic wand that creates wealthy tycoons.

The marketization of power in China has one special characteristic, that is, power relies on the market to realize profit, and the two operate closely together to make power profitable.

The most convenient way to do this is to have two systems in one family, which means the head of a family works in a government agency, whereas the wife, offspring, and siblings run businesses to cash in on the power.

The feast of wealth began in 1990s in China, and now red aristocrats can be seen in every sector, including electricity, oil, real estate, the stock market, the financial sector, and so on. According to reports on the Internet, about 200 Chinese political families have monopolized China’s wealth.

A diplomatic cable leaked by WikiLeaks in August 2011 said former Chinese Premier Li Peng and his family controlled all electric power interests, Politburo member and security czar Zhou Yongkang and his cronies controlled the oil interests, while Premier Wen Jiabao’s wife controlled China’s precious gems sector.

Over 130 state-owned enterprises under the state-owned Assets Supervision and Administration Commission of the State Council are said to be operated or managed by people who come from an official family background.

In fact, the biggest problem in China today is not the gap between rich and poor, but that the regime’s insiders took the nation’s wealth hostage long ago.

There is no doubt that these “red entrepreneurs” will become an important force influencing China’s economic policies in the future. They will participate in policymaking, especially the heads of some of the monopolized industries in important sectors vital to the national economy and peoples’ livelihoods.

About 200 Chinese political families have monopolized China’s wealth.

For example, the will of Party delegates from oil, electrical, coal, and chemical industries can be easily transformed into the nation’s industrial and social policies.

The Three Represents

Throughout the post-Mao era, the CCP has been pondering how to explain the distribution of wealth under one-Party dictatorial rule. The reality of the alliance between power and money has put the CCP in an awkward situation.

However, former Party head Jiang Zemin’s contribution to communist ideology, called the “Three Represents,” has helped free the CCP from this theoretical dilemma. It has changed the CCP from representing the three revolutionary classes of workers, peasants, and soldiers, to representing three key interests: the development of advanced productive forces (directed toward economic elites, urban middle class, intellectuals, and high-tech experts), the orientation toward an advanced Chinese culture, and the interests of the vast majority of the Chinese people.

The introduction of the “Three Represents” provided legitimacy for the CCP to build a new social foundation. Since then, the CCP has implemented new strategies to recruit economic elites (or capitalists) to join the Party. This strategy establishes institutional ties by way of industrial and commercial associations representing the interests of the economic elites, and thereby eliminating potentially challenging political forces.

U.S political scientist Samuel Huntington found that one of the main threats to an authoritarian regime is the “diversification of the elite resulting from the rise of new groups controlling autonomous sources of economic power, that is, from the development of an independently wealthy business and industrial middle class.”

The high degree of monopolization of national resources combined with the marketization of power has turned Chinese officials into people who are capable of “creating kings.”

Now the CCP has turned its Party Congress and the annual sessions of National People’s Congress and National Committee of the Chinese People’s Political Consultative Conference into institutional opportunities for political elites to meet with rich people, thereby effectively eliminating the potential threat from these economic elites and achieving an “elite republicanism.”

Related Articles

  • Gordon Chang Predicts Chinese Communist Party’s Collapse

Currently based in the United States, He Qinglian is a prominent Chinese author and economist.

Read the original Chinese article.

 

Print Friendly, PDF & Email
英文文章 Tags:Open Alliance, Power and Money, The Communist Party’s 18th Congress

Post navigation

Previous Post: 我经历了桑迪飓风
Next Post: 中国接受普适价值究竟难在何处?

Related Posts

  • Discussions on Democracy in China More Meaningful Than Who Will Rule 英文文章
  • The New Myth in China: China’s Rising Middle-class Will Accelerate Democratization 英文文章
  • On Systemic Corruption in China and its Influence 英文文章
  • A Different Type of Social Power: Underground Criminal Organizations 英文文章
  • On State Crime and Political Responsibility 英文文章
  • China’s ‘New Judicial Reform’ Not What It Claims to Be 英文文章

Comments (0) on “Open Alliance of Power and Money Meets in Beijing”

  1. ァッションについての質iZL says:
    October 5, 2015 at 02:11

    uittonのポルeo
    ァッションについての質iZL http://sashinni1980.seesaa.net/article/427277082.html

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

公告

清涟居欢迎各位网友来访并留下足迹。如果有对本网站改善服务的建议,请留言。

导航

  • 学术思考
  • 中国观察
  • 经济分析
  • 世界与中国
  • 国土生态
  • 传媒观察
  • 历史与文化
  • 读书与随笔
  • 采访与演讲
  • 英文文章
  • 日文文章
  • 程晓农文集

友情链接

  • 何清涟VOA博客
  • 何清涟文章日译文链接(由Minya_J先生管理)
  • 何清涟英文专栏(由Ariel Tian管理)
  • 何清涟英文博客(由@kRiZcPEc管理)
  • 夏小强的世界
  • @HeQinglian

学术专著

  • 中国现代化的陷阱
  • 人口:中国的悬剑
  • 雾锁中国
  • 中国政府行为的黑社会化

最新文章

  • “乌克兰疲劳症”使台湾国际认知变清醒
  • 澳大利亚外长访华,两国关系重点难点何在?
  • 美国“老兵”纷纷炮轰军中“觉醒主义”
  • 江泽民时代的三个关键词之三:相对宽松
  • 江泽民时代的三个关键词之二:开放

好文荐读

好文荐读
  • 张锦华:警惕中共的锐实力——红色大外宣
  • 胡平:郑重推荐《中国:溃而不崩》
  • 当今中国信息库•当前中国解析式 ——评《中国:溃而不崩》
  • 僵而不死的百足之虫 ——评何清涟,程晓农《中国:溃而不崩》
  • 从一个陷阱到另一个陷阱

日文文章

  • 何清漣★フランスの「エレガント・レフト」が米国の極左を恐れる 2021年3月16日 0 Comments Posted on: Jun 6th, 2021
  • 程暁農★バイデンの中国政策の二つの顔 2021年03月11日 0 Comments Posted on: Jun 6th, 2021
  • 何清漣★趙婷の「ノマドランド」が映し出す米・中の社会病  2021年3月9日 0 Comments Posted on: Jun 6th, 2021
  • 程暁農★米軍の最新の米中軍事対立情勢評価  : 2021年2月23日 0 Comments Posted on: Jun 6th, 2021

Featuring Top 4/903 of 日文文章

Read more

Meta

  • Register
  • Log in
  • Entries feed
  • Comments feed
  • WordPress.org
  • 中国民众真成了“国家的敌人”? 中国观察
  • 国家责任与国际道义何者优先? ——从中国联大“7承诺与6个100项目”说起 世界与中国
  • 中国环境评价为何成了邯郸学步? 国土生态
  • 中国的社会信用评价体系为何让人恐惧? 中国观察
  • 窃选者的炫耀:《影子竞选秘史》发表之因由(1) 世界与中国
  • 2013年:新闻自由离中国更遥远 中国观察
  • Hoping for a Gorbachev in Today’s China 英文文章
  • 管控冲突风险,美中在天津谈不出结果 世界与中国

Copyright © 2023 清涟居.

Powered by PressBook News WordPress theme